Matter type
Federal civil rights
McIntyre v. United States — Federal civil-rights and government-accountability litigation resulting in a published District Court decision—addressing government conduct and constitutional obligations.
Federal civil rights
District of Massachusetts
Federal civil-rights accountability litigation
The plaintiff pursued federal civil-rights claims against the United States, alleging government conduct that violated constitutional protections. Cases against the federal government require navigation of sovereign immunity, the Federal Tort Claims Act, and Bivens-style accountability frameworks.
The matter proceeded through extensive discovery and motion practice in the District of Massachusetts. The firm developed factual and legal arguments addressing the scope of government liability and the remedies available to individuals harmed by federal conduct.
The court issued a published opinion at 254 F. Supp. 2d 183—adding to the firm's record of reported federal decisions in civil-rights and government-accountability matters.
The case drew national media coverage, including an MSNBC interview with counsel discussing the civil-rights implications of government conduct—a reflection of the public interest in holding federal actors accountable.
McIntyre v. United States, 254 F. Supp. 2d 183 · District of Massachusetts
Read the opinion ↗Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
← All representative matters · Request a review · Media archive
In the news
MSNBC · Interview on federal civil rights lawsuit · Original coverage ↗
Press archive
Selected articles, broadcasts, and filings reporting on this matter. Links open the original publisher.
Related services
Tell us where you are—investigation, trial, appeal, or post-judgment. Early counsel protects evidence and deadlines.