Published decision

United States v. Tedeschi

United States v. Tedeschi — Published First Circuit criminal appeal addressing Speedy Trial Act exclusions for time reasonably necessary to resolve pretrial suppression motions.

1985Year
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First CircuitForum
First Circuit Speedy Trial Act rulingOutcome
Jeffrey A. DennerCounsel

Matter type

Federal criminal appeal

Venue

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Outcome

First Circuit Speedy Trial Act ruling

Why this matter was high-stakes

  • Federal drug-conspiracy appeal
  • Speedy Trial Act calculation
  • Suppression-motion litigation
  • Published First Circuit opinion

Federal appellate dispute

The defendants appealed federal cocaine-conspiracy convictions after trial occurred approximately seven months after indictment. The central issue was whether enough elapsed days were non-excludable under the Speedy Trial Act's seventy-day framework.

Suppression motions and excluded time

The First Circuit analyzed delay associated with suppression motions involving probable cause, a warrantless bag search, Miranda waiver, and a warrantless apartment search. It held that at least sixteen challenged days were reasonably necessary to address those motions and therefore excluded from the statutory calculation.

Published holding

The court concluded that no more than seventy non-excludable days had elapsed and affirmed the judgments. It also discussed the need for reasonably contemporaneous findings when a court excludes extended motion-related delay.

Why the case remains relevant

The decision is part of the First Circuit's published Speedy Trial Act jurisprudence and illustrates the record-intensive analysis required when pretrial motion practice, detention, and trial scheduling overlap.

Published decision

United States v. Tedeschi, 774 F.2d 511 · First Circuit

Read the opinion ↗

Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

← All representative matters · Request a review · Media archive

Related services

Facing something similar?

Tell us where you are—investigation, trial, appeal, or post-judgment. Early counsel protects evidence and deadlines.

Request confidential review