Matter type
Federal criminal appeal
United States v. Tedeschi — Published First Circuit criminal appeal addressing Speedy Trial Act exclusions for time reasonably necessary to resolve pretrial suppression motions.
Federal criminal appeal
U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
First Circuit Speedy Trial Act ruling
The defendants appealed federal cocaine-conspiracy convictions after trial occurred approximately seven months after indictment. The central issue was whether enough elapsed days were non-excludable under the Speedy Trial Act's seventy-day framework.
The First Circuit analyzed delay associated with suppression motions involving probable cause, a warrantless bag search, Miranda waiver, and a warrantless apartment search. It held that at least sixteen challenged days were reasonably necessary to address those motions and therefore excluded from the statutory calculation.
The court concluded that no more than seventy non-excludable days had elapsed and affirmed the judgments. It also discussed the need for reasonably contemporaneous findings when a court excludes extended motion-related delay.
The decision is part of the First Circuit's published Speedy Trial Act jurisprudence and illustrates the record-intensive analysis required when pretrial motion practice, detention, and trial scheduling overlap.
Attorney advertising. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
← All representative matters · Request a review · Media archive
Related services
Tell us where you are—investigation, trial, appeal, or post-judgment. Early counsel protects evidence and deadlines.